<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>freachable.net - tinfoilhat</title>
    <link>http://freachable.net/</link>
    <description>Next generation's garbage</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Hafthor Stefansson</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:15:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.1.8102.813</generator>
    <managingEditor>blog@freachable.net</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>blog@freachable.net</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://freachable.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://freachable.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://freachable.net/PermaLink,guid,a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Hafthor Stefansson</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://freachable.net/CommentView,guid,a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://freachable.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">While the pundits (no, not me, the other
pundits) argue about whether Apple is trying to protect their delicate users from
the chainsaw gangs of Flash apps or if Adobe is now being beaten like an LAPD cop
killer because of some ancient grudge, I'm thinking that their may be a whole 'nother
reason: It is step one on the road to<b> killing the Mac</b>.<br /><br />
Why kill the Mac? Easy. Jobs can only make money on hardware and a little bit on their
own software, but he wants the 30% on everything like he's getting on the iPhoneOS
side. Can't lock down the Mac and setup an app store on it now, so it must die.<br /><br />
In order to kill the Mac, you'd need to be able to do everything you can do on a Mac
on a iPad (well, except for development -- screw you developers!)<br /><br />
Replace my Mac? Yep. Get iWork on the iPad and a bluetooth keyboard. Oh, you want
a bigger screen and everything. Ok, what about a 15" iPad Pro that folds up like a
laptop with a built-in keyboard and multitouch trackpad/display. MacBook Air-like
dimensions with a full day's battery life. Oh yeah, and you can sync it directly to
your iPhone.<br /><br /><img temp_src="./content/binary/iPad Pro.png" src="./content/binary/iPad%20Pro.png" width="384" height="231" /><br /><br />
What more do you need pointy-haired boss? Pointy-haired boss wants a corporate dashboard
application on his iPad with notifications... pronto!<br /><br />
The one kind of development Apple does want is iPhoneOS development. What if there
was an app available for free in the app store that let you design your UI, kinda
like you do in Interface Builder now, and let you write code. When you're ready to
test, you click build, the code goes up to Apple, is compiled, packaged, signed and
comes back to your iPad ready for you to test and debug. When you are satisfied with
the results, click Publish and your app is in the App Store, ready to be enjoyed by
all fartapp-aficionados.<br /><br />
Ah, but how can that work if you are doing stuff like Corona, MonoTouch or CS5. And
so 3.3.1 had to be changed.<br /><br />
So, specifically, my predictions are:<br />
*<b> iPad Pro</b> - Ives will twist his hands and say that they completely rethought
the portable computer and voila, iPad Pro w/ laptop style and a second touch-display
that acts like a trackpad - the whole package suitable for authoring applications
- at the same time, Steve will declare that they listened to you and now you can own
and use an iPad and iPad Pro without iTunes and you can sync your iPhone to your iPad
Pro.<br />
*<b> iPad XCode</b> - Integrated Development Environment on the iPad Pro for authoring
apps for the appstore. Maybe free, maybe $49. But it won't include a compiler or code-signer.
Your source will go to Apple to be compiled, signed, versioned, scrutinized and approved.<br />
*<b> Mac languish</b> - only minor hardware improvements - Snow Leopard is the last
Mac OS - security problems go unfixed and just become justification for the glorious
iPad Pro. Every move they make will be to reduce the need for people to buy Macs.<br /><br />
The net effect is Steve gets his 30% on everything.<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://freachable.net/aggbug.ashx?id=a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8" /></body>
      <title>Crackpot theory on Apple's 3.3.1</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://freachable.net/PermaLink,guid,a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://freachable.net/2010/04/30/CrackpotTheoryOnApples331.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>While the pundits (no, not me, the other pundits) argue about whether Apple is trying to protect their delicate users from the chainsaw gangs of Flash apps or if Adobe is now being beaten like an LAPD cop killer because of some ancient grudge, I'm thinking that their may be a whole 'nother reason: It is step one on the road to&lt;b&gt; killing
the Mac&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why kill the Mac? Easy. Jobs can only make money on hardware and a little bit on their
own software, but he wants the 30% on everything like he's getting on the iPhoneOS
side. Can't lock down the Mac and setup an app store on it now, so it must die.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In order to kill the Mac, you'd need to be able to do everything you can do on a Mac
on a iPad (well, except for development -- screw you developers!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Replace my Mac? Yep. Get iWork on the iPad and a bluetooth keyboard. Oh, you want
a bigger screen and everything. Ok, what about a 15" iPad Pro that folds up like a
laptop with a built-in keyboard and multitouch trackpad/display. MacBook Air-like
dimensions with a full day's battery life. Oh yeah, and you can sync it directly to
your iPhone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img temp_src="./content/binary/iPad Pro.png" src="./content/binary/iPad%20Pro.png" width="384" height="231"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What more do you need pointy-haired boss? Pointy-haired boss wants a corporate dashboard
application on his iPad with notifications... pronto!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The one kind of development Apple does want is iPhoneOS development. What if there
was an app available for free in the app store that let you design your UI, kinda
like you do in Interface Builder now, and let you write code. When you're ready to
test, you click build, the code goes up to Apple, is compiled, packaged, signed and
comes back to your iPad ready for you to test and debug. When you are satisfied with
the results, click Publish and your app is in the App Store, ready to be enjoyed by
all fartapp-aficionados.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ah, but how can that work if you are doing stuff like Corona, MonoTouch or CS5. And
so 3.3.1 had to be changed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So, specifically, my predictions are:&lt;br&gt;
*&lt;b&gt; iPad Pro&lt;/b&gt; - Ives will twist his hands and say that they completely rethought
the portable computer and voila, iPad Pro w/ laptop style and a second touch-display
that acts like a trackpad - the whole package suitable for authoring applications
- at the same time, Steve will declare that they listened to you and now you can own
and use an iPad and iPad Pro without iTunes and you can sync your iPhone to your iPad
Pro.&lt;br&gt;
*&lt;b&gt; iPad XCode&lt;/b&gt; - Integrated Development Environment on the iPad Pro for authoring
apps for the appstore. Maybe free, maybe $49. But it won't include a compiler or code-signer.
Your source will go to Apple to be compiled, signed, versioned, scrutinized and approved.&lt;br&gt;
*&lt;b&gt; Mac languish&lt;/b&gt; - only minor hardware improvements - Snow Leopard is the last
Mac OS - security problems go unfixed and just become justification for the glorious
iPad Pro. Every move they make will be to reduce the need for people to buy Macs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The net effect is Steve gets his 30% on everything.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://freachable.net/aggbug.ashx?id=a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://freachable.net/CommentView,guid,a69512b2-ddd5-452d-828c-6a9720675dd8.aspx</comments>
      <category>Apple</category>
      <category>Security</category>
      <category>tinfoilhat</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>